/p/ - Photography » Thread #3806258

[42 / 7 / ?]

332KiB, 2356x1206, 06A24F88-215E-48CA-B660-B8FC8ADC080D.jpg

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 12:18:58 No.3806258 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3806268 >>3806425 >>3806496

Bruh is he really using a DSLR in 2021?

Imagine not having the official Ken Rockwell™ seal of Mirrorless Advantage™ on your camera bag.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 12:21:21 No.3806259 Report

Quoted By:

Whoops! Looks like you've started a gear thread outside of the gear general. Do worry, rookie mistake... Here is a link provided to you by the >hasphotos of /p/

>>3804706

Phew, now you can delete this thread and help keep /p/ a better place.
Thank you

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 12:54:25 No.3806268 Report

Quoted By: >>3806276 >>3806295

>>3806258
What's so great about mirrorless?
t. /p/hotography n00b

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 13:07:37 No.3806276 Report

Quoted By: >>3806409

>>3806268
https://kenrockwell.com/tech/mirrorless-vs-dslr.htm
Plus you can use old manual lenses (M39 etc.) on mirrorless, which you can’t do on DSLRs.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1611339608433.png, 19KiB, 645x770

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 13:40:04 No.3806293 Report

Quoted By:

>what is that a MIRRORLESS camera? Do you have SISSY arms???? why not use a DSLR like the rest of my Hitler themed Minecraft server??

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 13:41:05 No.3806295 Report

Quoted By: >>3806391

>>3806268
Mirrorless cameras are DSLRs with the whole mechanical mirror system removed. So they're much smaller with space to adapt new glass etc.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO M10_MONO_Ambient05_RGB_15cm.jpg, 358KiB, 1575x1181

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 13:51:46 No.3806298 Report

Quoted By: >>3806351

There is only one mirrorless photographers need.

The rest is just toys for poors.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 14:27:08 No.3806313 Report

Quoted By:

>2021
>not using a combination of a Flagship DSLR (1Dx / D6) with a Mirrorless

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 15:42:25 No.3806351 Report

Quoted By: >>3806359 >>3806365 >>3806370 >>3806379 >>3806382 >>3806391

>>3806298
Still don't understand the point of Leica's in the digital age. Their cameras were something special when cameras were mechanical machines and precision engineering paid off. Nowadays it's nothing but some housing for a sensor + microprocessor which determine a lot more about how good or bad a camera is.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 15:49:23 No.3806359 Report

Quoted By: >>3806370

>>3806351
hipster gearfaggotry. It gets memed a lot but there absolutely are people out there who will buy expensive things simply to show them off to others.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 15:56:14 No.3806365 Report

Quoted By: >>3806370

>>3806351
Rangefinders are a stupid concept in general

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO CA7BE79F-AFC7-4EAE-89F1-55640345 (...).png, 664KiB, 836x983

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:00:37 No.3806370 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806351
>>3806359
>>3806365

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:22:48 No.3806379 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806351
>point of Leica's in the digital age
Asserting dominance

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:25:38 No.3806382 Report

Quoted By: >>3806384

>>3806351
>Nowadays it's nothing but some housing for a sensor + microprocessor which determine a lot more about how good or bad a camera is.

back then cameras were just housing for a film

nothing changed

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:30:41 No.3806383 Report

Quoted By:

their lenses are nice the nothing about the body justifies the price tag

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:30:50 No.3806384 Report

Quoted By: >>3806386

>>3806382
>back then cameras were just housing for a film
With 1kg of machinery to advance and expose it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:31:50 No.3806386 Report

Quoted By: >>3806387

>>3806384
>With 1kg of machinery to advance and expose it
since leica use a cloth shutter you're embarassing yourself

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:34:32 No.3806387 Report

Quoted By: >>3806388

>>3806386
The digital leica?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:35:14 No.3806388 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806387
pretty sure your "1kg of machinery to expose" was related to film, as you were replying to me

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:37:56 No.3806391 Report

Quoted By: >>3806394 >>3806403

>>3806351
Leica sensors have special microlenses that negate the aberrations caused by lenses designed for film when hitting the thick filter stack on common sensor designs at a rather extreme angle from the thin throat of the M39 mount.
Also they're the only rangefinder digital cameras you can buy new.
>>3806295
This, except the extra glass they can adapt doesn't work well with digital sensors and negates many of their advantages like eye AF that are the actual selling points.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:39:12 No.3806394 Report

Quoted By: >>3806402

>>3806391
>the extra glass they can adapt doesn't work well with digital sensors
only for FF

you don't notice most of this stuff on aps-c because the corners are cut

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:46:32 No.3806402 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806394
Fair enough, you're right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:47:35 No.3806403 Report

Quoted By: >>3806429

>>3806391
>Also they're the only rangefinder digital cameras you can buy new.
This is false.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:57:13 No.3806409 Report

Quoted By: >>3806410

>>3806276
Interesting, but wow this guy comes off as kind of a fag.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 16:57:49 No.3806410 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806409
>he doesn't know Ken Godwell

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1602101969467.jpg, 38KiB, 239x226

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:12:06 No.3806425 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806258
keep gearshittery in the containment thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:12:47 No.3806429 Report

Quoted By: >>3806431

>>3806403
Do you know some place with new old stock Epson R-D1 cameras?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:13:41 No.3806431 Report

Quoted By: >>3806437

>>3806429
I'm not even going to list the currently sold rangefinder style digital cameras for you since you're clearly baiting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:18:23 No.3806437 Report

Quoted By: >>3806439 >>3806492

>>3806431
>rangefinder "style"
kek, so a toy for larpers.
That's like saying a Fiero with a bodykit is a Ferrari and drives like one.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:20:11 No.3806439 Report

Quoted By: >>3806442

>>3806437
>please list me rangefinder digital cameras
>but not from the brand which gangstalks me

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:28:53 No.3806442 Report

Quoted By: >>3806445

>>3806439
I said Leica is the only brand of rangefinder digital cameras you can buy new. You said it was "false". Then you moved the goalposts to "rangefinder style" when called out, a meaningless term that could have described any point and shoot with illuminated frame lines from the film era since you're basing your argument on looks instead of function.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:33:43 No.3806445 Report

Quoted By: >>3806450 >>3806452

>>3806442
Ok mr incel
How is a Lolca a "r33l rangefinder" but an X-Pro is not?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:37:45 No.3806450 Report

Quoted By: >>3806453

>>3806445
Because it has the defining element of a rangefinder camera, a split prism to focus the picture.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:38:51 No.3806452 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806445
Because it has a rangefinder mechanism

Keep moving that goalpost tho

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:39:14 No.3806453 Report

Quoted By: >>3806463

>>3806450
lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:51:46 No.3806463 Report

Quoted By: >>3806469 >>3806474

>>3806453
You're the equivalent of a guy trying to force his Model T into a CCCA show and getting mad because they tell him his car isn't a classic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:59:30 No.3806469 Report

Quoted By: >>3806474

>>3806463
Or just someone blatantly losing an argument online and taking it poorly

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 18:04:02 No.3806474 Report

Quoted By: >>3806479

>>3806463
>>3806469
Fujifilm are rangefinder cameras. Just because you don't like them doesn't mean they aren't seen as the major manufacturer of modern digital rangefinder cameras.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 545DD66C-2E40-49C4-BAA0-5B1D905F (...).png, 1MiB, 1242x2208

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 18:12:10 No.3806479 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806474
womp womp

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 18:43:04 No.3806492 Report

Quoted By: >>3806497

>>3806437
>a toy for larpers
Wait, which brand are we talking about now? Leica or Fuji?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 18:50:08 No.3806496 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806258
I thought Ken Rockwell preferred the RP.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 3659643110_acbc0baac3_o.jpg, 455KiB, 1000x684

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 18:50:15 No.3806497 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806492
*insert tired dentist joke*
Fujis are toys, designed to play a game where you pretend you're using a rangefinder. Designed like that by their marketing department, mind you.
They're no more rangefinders than a Regula Picca is.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches