>>3806847No, I and the other guy are annoyed that you came into the thread with your narcissism to specifically try to derail the thread. And nice job quoting my post twice for some reason to make it seem like I'm samefagging.
>it's f/8 and *I* prefer f/5.6!Well aren't you speshul. The fact is, it doesn't fucking matter if you offer unwanted criticism because I, like most people, have learned from my past mistakes already. Why am I posting 10 year old photos? Because I don't own this camera anymore, so all of my photos taken with it are that old.
I don't need your stupid criticism about the f-stop for this photo. That is far from the most significant problem with the exposure of that photo anyway. If you were actually intelligent, you would have noticed that these goats move slowly, but the photo was shot at 1/3000 sec in Av mode with ISO set manually. If I were to do it again, I would have kept ISO at Auto or 200 and shot many photos at 1/800 sec--some would have been motion-blurred, but I would have gotten plenty of keepers with better detail because some detail is lost at ISO 800. For that lens, I do believe that f/8 is appropriate for wildlife, since it's a little soft wide open. I just didn't think through all my settings at the time.
So not only are you a narcissist, but you're also stupid, bad at photography and bad at giving criticism. Castrate yourself, dilate and seethe, faggot.
