/p/ - Photography » Thread #3806576

[63 / 20 / ?]

2MiB, 2000x1333, film or nah.jpg

u know what time it is

xt2nigger Wed 27 Jan 2021 19:59:21 No.3806576 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3806579 >>3806580 >>3806583 >>3806584 >>3806591 >>3806644 >>3806662 >>3807391 >>3807397 >>3807401 >>3807417 >>3807759

its time to play FILM OR DIGITAL

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 20:02:06 No.3806579 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
Judging on the distortion, grain and light leaks, I would say a Sony.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 20:06:50 No.3806580 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
remove the exif next time lol
also it looks like it's from streetview desu

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 20:09:47 No.3806583 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
It's so blurry it wouldn't matter, but from the shitty way the plants rendered I'm going to say digital and I'm going to say Fuji

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 20:11:04 No.3806584 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
Select all images with car.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 20:14:22 No.3806589 Report

Quoted By:

it's shit either way

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 20:20:12 No.3806591 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
Film 'scanned' with Snoyi camera.

xt2nigger

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO fuji XT5.jpg, 34KiB, 250x176

xt2nigger Wed 27 Jan 2021 20:56:45 No.3806615 Report

Quoted By: >>3806625

keep the guesses coming folks, I'll release the answer tomorrow at 4PM EST

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20170822-DSC02461.jpg, 627KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 21:10:30 No.3806625 Report

Quoted By: >>3806635 >>3807397 >>3807401

>>3806615
It's a badly inverted negative against your dirty window, faggot.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20170822-DSC02475.jpg, 576KiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 21:16:28 No.3806630 Report

Quoted By: >>3806635 >>3807397 >>3807401

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 21:20:38 No.3806635 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806625
>>3806630
digital

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 21:33:20 No.3806644 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
>this is what fuji cucks imagine portra looks like

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 21:56:17 No.3806662 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
Digital

xt2nigger

xt2nigger Thu 28 Jan 2021 15:21:40 No.3807373 Report

Quoted By: >>3807379 >>3808693

Cast your final guesses, nerds
I'll be posting the answer soon

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 15:32:09 No.3807379 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807373
I don't care.

Besides those images are all old. No one has been walking around without a mask for at least a year and Shake 'em Buns closed two years ago.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 15:47:11 No.3807391 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
Not film

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 15:54:27 No.3807397 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
Digital
>>3806625
Digital
>>3806630
Film

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 15:56:15 No.3807401 Report

Quoted By: >>3810855

>>3806630
>>3806625
>>3806576
have zoomers really never saw a film photo printed/negative in their life?

do they really only have experience with photos on screen?
Nobody born before 1990 will mistake these for film

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:15:12 No.3807417 Report

Quoted By:

>>3806576
Looks like a still from a 90s camcorder

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO MVC-009F.jpg, 41KiB, 640x480

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:36:41 No.3807434 Report

Quoted By: >>3807448

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Kat_35_kep24.jpg, 767KiB, 1524x1038

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:39:09 No.3807438 Report

Quoted By: >>3807448

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO kep45.jpg, 80KiB, 1024x676

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:40:11 No.3807439 Report

Quoted By: >>3807448

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO gdghdghdf.jpg, 5MiB, 2064x3058

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:42:38 No.3807441 Report

Quoted By: >>3807448

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO gdghdd.jpg, 4MiB, 2066x3027

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:43:49 No.3807443 Report

Quoted By: >>3807448

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Gescanntes Dokumghfdhent.jpg, 4MiB, 3044x2058

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:45:08 No.3807444 Report

Quoted By: >>3807448

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:52:40 No.3807448 Report

Quoted By: >>3807452

>>3807434
D
>>3807438
F
>>3807439
F
>>3807441
Idk, probably d
>>3807443
Same, so many artifacts it's hard to tell
>>3807444
D

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:55:51 No.3807452 Report

Quoted By: >>3807653

>>3807448
All except the first one are film. Bottom 3 were shot using an original Lomo.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO dicaprio.jpg, 73KiB, 640x639

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 16:58:29 No.3807455 Report

Quoted By: >>3807859

Based op! Can't wait for nuclear seething once faggots realize that they cant distinguish film from digital as good as they think.

Just like a last time

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 20:32:31 No.3807653 Report

Quoted By: >>3808709

>>3807452
What the fuck is an "original lomo"? Are you talking about the Russian camera company Lomo or the new faggot company Lomography that dropships cheap Chinese junk?

xt2nigger

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO fuckyou.webm, 503KiB, 640x480

xt2nigger Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:06:00 No.3807674 Report

Quoted By: >>3807692

ok you fucking niggers here's your fucking answer, almost all of you are fucking wrong lmao

xt2nigger

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2021-01-25-0003.jpg, 4MiB, 2000x2008

xt2nigger Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:08:41 No.3807677 Report

Quoted By: >>3807689 >>3807700 >>3807863 >>3809268

heres the full scan without bullshit editing to blow out the sky, i shot this with ektar 100 and an agfa click so dont try to give me any shit cus its soft, its a toy camera lmao
scanned it with an epson v200 and some shitty aftermarket backlight i bought from a thrift store for 3 bucks

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:19:44 No.3807689 Report

Quoted By: >>3807690 >>3809277

>>3807677
looks like shit, next time use a proper film scanner and it may look like film

xt2nigger

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Negative0-15-12A(1).jpg, 4MiB, 2100x1400

xt2nigger Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:22:09 No.3807690 Report

Quoted By: >>3807695

>>3807689
the epson v200 is a proper film scanner lol be more assmad that you cant distinguish between film and digital

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:23:16 No.3807692 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807674
NOOO!!! HE CAN'T KEEP GOING AWAY WITH IT!!! JANNIES BAN BAN!

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:24:50 No.3807695 Report

Quoted By: >>3807703

>>3807690
It would be with its stock backlight, not with your bullshit setup.
Might as well use a document scanner.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:29:06 No.3807700 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807677
You either suck at developing or actually scanned it with a Fuji camera.
That's either sensor worms or silver reticulation from a piss-poor bleach bath.

xt2nigger

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_20210128_222816.jpg, 4MiB, 4000x3000

xt2nigger Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:30:19 No.3807703 Report

Quoted By: >>3807710

>>3807695
Oops i guess my legit EPSON™ backlight made for EPSON™ scanners isnt a real EPSON™ film scanner lmao get fucked kid

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO go away.jpg, 28KiB, 600x600

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:41:03 No.3807710 Report

Quoted By: >>3807715

>>3807703
It's mismatched so no

xt2nigger

xt2nigger Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:50:56 No.3807715 Report

Quoted By: >>3807717

>>3807710
BUHH BUHHH ITS MISMATCHED BUHHH INVALIDATED

xt2nigger

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_20210128_225033.jpg, 2MiB, 3264x2448

xt2nigger Thu 28 Jan 2021 21:53:20 No.3807717 Report

Quoted By: >>3807738

>>3807715
Forgot pic lololo guess this is also invalid then
Admit it, youre arseangry because you werent correct for the billionth time in your "life"

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 22:12:17 No.3807738 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807717
Ahhh, the glorious Fuji glass that not even Fuji users want to buy

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 28 Jan 2021 22:57:50 No.3807759 Report

Quoted By: >>3807857

>>3806576
>good photo / bad photo
what we really need to be playing, and this is dogshit regardless of format

xt2nigger

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20200925-051234__01.jpg, 402KiB, 1440x1117

xt2nigger Fri 29 Jan 2021 00:20:22 No.3807857 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807759
point still stands
/pee/nises dont know what the fuck they are saying majority if the time.
Seethe.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 2021 00:22:25 No.3807859 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807455
based

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 2021 00:23:21 No.3807861 Report

Quoted By: >>3807865

Are you seriously telling me you went to all that effort to prove that the loud-mouthed twats on /p/ are know-nothing fucktards?

I thought it was obvious.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 2021 00:24:15 No.3807863 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807677
Jesus Christ that looks terrible

xt2nigger

xt2nigger Fri 29 Jan 2021 00:25:39 No.3807865 Report

Quoted By: >>3807875

>>3807861
Implying shitposting on memechan is a lot of effort lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 2021 00:27:23 No.3807875 Report

Quoted By: >>3808688

>>3807865
it clearly is for some people

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 2021 00:33:13 No.3807885 Report

Quoted By: >>3808662

Easy:

>Is the image edited on Lr/Ps/Snapseed/GIMP and posted on 4chan?

if yes

it's digital.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Negative0-13-11(1).jpg, 911KiB, 2100x1400

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 2021 20:17:59 No.3808391 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO cat.png, 1MiB, 1448x921

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 02:48:17 No.3808599 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 05:16:26 No.3808662 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807885
I edit all my film shots with ps to finish them

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 05:48:09 No.3808688 Report

Quoted By: >>3808708

>>3807875
OC is OC, toldfag

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 05:54:36 No.3808693 Report

Quoted By: >>3809486

>>3807373
no1 cares

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 06:12:40 No.3808708 Report

Quoted By:

>>3808688
it may be OC but it is also CC

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 06:14:31 No.3808709 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807653
>Are you talking about the Russian camera company Lomo
yes

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 31 Jan 2021 02:47:35 No.3809268 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807677
looks miles better than whatever the hell you posted originally

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 31 Jan 2021 03:01:43 No.3809277 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807689
THE COPE LMAO

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 31 Jan 2021 03:04:45 No.3809279 Report

Quoted By:

OP is a faggot, what else is new?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 31 Jan 2021 03:29:31 No.3809301 Report

Quoted By:

i don't even have to open the thumbnails to tell you with 100% certainty they're all digital

xt2nigger

xt2nigger Sun 31 Jan 2021 11:19:23 No.3809486 Report

Quoted By:

>>3808693
u cared enough to post thanks for the bump :)))

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 02 Feb 2021 04:09:28 No.3810855 Report

Quoted By:

>>3807401
You're right. They look better then film. No way to mistake that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 02 Feb 2021 15:06:46 No.3811246 Report

Quoted By:

Every now and then you need a thread like this to keep everyone sober. Thanks OP.
>muh mismatch
lol

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

u know what time it is