>>3809942I put my money where my mouth is. I don't shoot something with a Sony sensor unlike you, manchild. What brand is irrelevant to the conversation, as I'm not a brand whore but know which ones to avoid (Fuji for the terrible images and ergonomics, Sony for the terrible build quality and ergonomics, although the latter seems to have improved in the latest video flagship the a7S III).
Plane anon is definitely a thing, maybe there's a more apt name for him.
>>3810160Agreed. It's hilarious to watch them and their pretend rangefinder toys, then them adapting rangefinder lenses and acting like they have a good setup when the 35mm acts like a lens longer than 50mm on their toy cameras (and should Fuji offer a full frame sensor, it would still look like shit). Then they pretend their little screens are rangefinders. They would be happier shooting film with a Kiev or a Zorki if they were actually interested in rangefinders and not in things that merely attempt to mimic the exterior look. Then you have the laughably pretentious film sims. They look horrible but the manchildren think that looks good and more, that it looks like film. "At first I thought it was a tragedy, but now I realize it's a comedy."
