>>3807269"Full frame" is in reference to the lens focal lengths being "true" to what you actually get. i.e. a 50mm lens produces a 50mm field of view, not a 75mm, or 100mm, or 34mm, or whatever. It's in reference to 35mm focal lengths which have been and continue to be the industry standard. Full frame never meant that the sensor was bigger, or that your dick was bigger. In the early days of full frame digital, those cameras were exclusively workhorses for pros and had a bunch of other meaningful qualities like stronger build or AF. Nowadays the waters aren't as clear, but full frame continues to be a more desired middle ground between larger cameras with larger sensors/film that are slower to operate, and smaller cameras with smaller sensors. It has a massive selection of lenses and support from the industry and it's users. It's basically the equivalent of HO scale in modern trains, a golden standard between massive, expensive G and O scale trains and smaller, less detailed N scale layouts.