>>3807723>I ould really love your explanation of how interpolated is more true to life. BOTH are interpolations. Once again: a single grain is one color, black. A single dye cloud in a layer is one color, either R, G, or B. The tones and colors you see in film are the end result of analog dithering, or more precisely the density of grain/dye clouds in a given space. This is very much a form of interpolation.
Which is more "true to life" depends entirely on which can distinguish more distinct tones/colors in a given space. No B&W film can distinguish 16k tones in the same area as a digital pixel. Let's go with DxOmark for evaluating distinct colors to account for any losses to noise and Bayer. DxOmark typically scores cameras at between 23 and 26 bit color depth at base ISO. No color film can reproduce any one of 8 million to 32 million colors in the same space as four pixels. (Four to be fair since a digital camera cannot assign color without looking at neighboring pixels.)
>Because youre talking complete garbage here. No, I'm talking objective, observable fact. Pick up a college textbook on the subject. Carry out the experiment I suggested earlier.
>Provia is meant to be neutral, LOL no. I was shooting Provia BEFORE the digital revolution (i.e. affordable DSLRs like the 10D). Provia was not neutral. If you asked a Fuji rep for a neutral slide film, he handed you Astia. I don't even know how you can look at Provia and think "neutral." Are you looking at really bad scans of it?
>but bayer will always alwys have worse color resolution than non-bayer.Canon's first FF DSLR, at 11mp, buried 35mm color film in all technical respects. It had more accurate color reproduction, could discern far more unique tones/colors (you needed at least MF to compare), and out resolved 35mm. Period. I lived it. I compared it. I know.
>When you look at slides through a loupe, its like youre there. Digital has never produced that effect for me.Learn to process.
