>>3827470>Looking at the corners are we? Well the DG DN is worse. Pic related.But apparently all of that is fixed if you don't sabotage the camera and turn off the profile in the lens. Apply the lens correction in both and the DG DN jumps ahead.
>Fine, but the lens is still worse.Only if you sabotage it, and ruin the way the EVF is supposed to work.
>Depends entirely on element material and shape.No. All things being equal means you must apply the same curves and shapes to the larger element, it will get more expensive.
>distortion correction can produce information They don't need to produce information, the smaller optics can simply be made better more easily and be sharper by default.
>but it was mis focused.Clearly not. We already established the HSM has CA by default. So it was just a matter of manipulating lighting and contrasting edges to make them show up.
>English isn't your first languageIrelevant. You did claim the Samyang lenses will be unprofitable due to nobody wanting them.
>You just implied it.No that's all inside your head. Or perhaps English isn't your first language?
>IT HAS TO BE INSIDE MUH LENZ!!!Yes retard. Otherwise it isn't what was intended by the lens maker, you can't apply just about any correction to it and still pretend to be objective.
It has to be form the lens manufacturer to count.
>muh electronicsReuse the other lens' electronics retard.
>muh testingAnd? You think Samwang is incapable of testing?
>muh support training>muh supplies>muh manufacturing linesHow retarded do you think Samyang is? Clearly you're projecting some of your own retardation into them.
>motors are identical in every lensYes retard. Their motor for their E-mount 45mm can be reused on RF mount.
This one is your dumbest point yet.
No really, are you 5 years old?
