>>3829047> I shot 2 photos with an unnecessarily high iso and shutter speed and neither of them are good enough for you >:'(>If I get it right, wrong or artistic perspectiveYou got both wrong, you've not been judged on any photos that come close to being well taken\"right". Your "artistic perspective" is "let my camera take a swing at interpreting what I wanted to show", which isn't artistic perspective, it's laziness and an unwilling to learn about your supposed hobby.
>>3829059>More time shooting less time processingSo far you've got a ratio of infinite time per good quality photo.
If you spent 100 hours on taking and editing just one good photo you'd be spending "more time shooting, less time processing". Unless your objective is just to click buttons on your camera in a public space, and not to actually produce photographs, which makes sense that you bought the larping camera.
>>3829064>People far awayDon't need a shutter speed as fast as people close up, and even when they're close up 1\160 would be plenty fast to freeze any motion.
Pro tip, stop speaking, it just exposes your ignorance and butthurt more and more.
>They're not judging the photoNo, I judged it, looks like shit.
