>>3841460Why on earth would you use an ND filter for these when you've already bumped the iso and ss.
Anon, go to your nearest thrift store, go to the books section, find the 35mm photographers handbook, buy it for $1, read the first 3 chapters, then try taking photos.
It's not about being "very detrimental", but just following the absolute basics of photography; like usual, you're outing yourself as a retard. Watching you post photos is like watching someone buy a $500 knife, then proceeds to cut things using the blunt, back edge of the blade, and when it gets pointed out they say "it cut my food, so that's what I meant to do" and they double down on their ignorance and buy another knife to use it just as wrong 6 months later.
>>3842521It's a crazy coincidence that no Fuji posters know the exposure triangle too, yet every other photographer on the board does. What are the chances.
>>3842721Sounds a lot like projection to me
>>3842580I would say it's more to do with the culture of anti-intellectualism that is fostered by Fuji users; which is fine for people to do in their own time, but when they try to profess it as superior to potentially new photographers that don't know better, it's a detriment to the board and to the hobby.
It's also quite boring seeing the same 2 posters spam the board day after day with their nonsense.
Can you name any reason why anyone would ever listen to an unemployed woman in their thirties that's never had a job and still lives with her parents about anything other than cat grooming?
