>>3845168Shit eating retard, allow me to break it down for you. OP was talking about a particular compositional trope common in LANDSCAPE photography, specifically rock/branch/whatever in immediate foreground. he then posted two more examples of it
You, being retarded, came in and picked out the two words that stood out to you ("wide angle") and somehow inferred that the rest of the post was saying that wide angle lenses are bad, and then decided that you should give your own examples of where wide angle lenses are good.
I then called you out on not reading a post with only seventeen fucking words in it, and your only response was "huh", mostly because you picked out two words from my post and decided to defend against that. I assume the two words were "Do you", to which your immediate response (regardless of inquiry) would be "NO YOU", because again, you're a retard.
