>>3846963One of the better ones in the set. Nice colours and contrast but the composition and framing could be much better.
>>3846964Boring. There's nothing here that's visually engaging.
>>3846965This isn't exposed properly. Highlights are way overexposed and the photo overall is a blurry mess. Looks like it was captured with a phone. Use a tripod.
>>3846967Same here.
>>3846969Subject takes up way too much of the frame and the composition is way too obvious. Use rule of thirds and try to add more interesting purposeful visual elements into the frame so people aren't just wondering why they're looking at a boring sign.
>>3846970Overcooked, too much blue, lines lead nowhere. Bad photo.
>>3846972Visually interesting textures, poor composition. I'm sure had you spent 5 minutes at the location to look for a good frame rather than shooting from the hip you would have had a much more interesting photo.
>>3846972Out of focus.
>>3846976>>3846980>>3847001Whats the primary focus here? Sky or wheat? You gotta choose.
>>3846984>>3846989>>3846997>>3846982Forgettable on their own but the aesthetics are pleasing and I think this could work nicely as part of a set.
>>3846983One of your better landscapes, at least it's more obvious the textures in the sky are the primary focus rather than a bad mishmash of the two. Still unremarkable though.
>>3846991Nice lines, good use of negative space and contrast, the lines however lead nowhere. This would be far more interesting with a person standing on the platform for instance.
>>3846993Out of focus. Sharp details work much better for architecture shots like these.
>>3846995Don't like the lifted blacks for a photo like this.
3/10 overall. There's not much to engage with visually and there's no underlying theme between these photos. I'm sure the locations you were at were interesting enough but it just doesn't seem like you spent any time trying to properly compose your photos.
