>>3860014>it's an almost textbook example of a brutalist buidlingIt's apparent concrete "apparent"?
>NoBuilt by the communists but is that a factor into making it brutalist?
>Actually noIt isn't one of the fancy ones, or the interesting ones, so is its mundane nature part of the brutalism?
>NoThen it isn't you stupid donkey humper.
>Brutalist buildings are characterised by minimalist constructionsFalse, see works of their founders: Marcel Breuer, Charles Jeanneret, Paul Rudolph
>showcase the bare building materials and structural elements over decorative designTrue, the structural work is in part the decorative design based on bewilderment
>makes use of exposed concrete or brick, angular geometric shapes and a predominantly monochromePartially false, it is usually concrete only but usually textured, can or cannot be monochrome, it depends.
>Check, check and check.Your picture does not check them because it breaks with the rules. You are an illiterate gorilla nigger, fuck your school and its playground.
