>>3861645>Which would u recommendI'd recommend the Fuji.
Pros of the Sony:
+ Much better image quality. Especially at higher ISOs, every ISO on the Sony is going to be about as noisy as the next slower ISO on the Fuji. Plus, sharper, more detailed images.
+ Full frame sensor means you can, for instance, adapt your FD lenses and use them just like on your Canon with no crop
+ I think more battery life, but I'm too lazy to look it up.
Pros of the Fuji:
+ Control scheme a lot closer to an F1 than the Sony has. So if you like your film camera, you'll feel more at home with the Fuji.
+ Fuji, in general, is better at making camera user interfaces, in my experience.
If you're used to shooting film, the extra image quality of the Sony is just gravy--even the Fuji's smaller sensor will give you vastly better high ISO output than you can get with any film on the market, and you'll probably get more detail than with all but the finest-grain slow-ass films like CMS20 or Velvia. The Sony's a little bit better, but you likely won't notice the difference most of the time unless you're looking at the shot at 100%. And my experience has always been that Sony interfaces make me want to throw my camera at the wall while Fuji interfaces make me want to go out and take more pictures.
So basically, the A7III stomps the floor with the Fuji on every technical level, but the Fuji wins on usability, and I find that that has a much bigger impact on whether or not I get good pictures with a given camera.
