>>3866850My DSLR seems to take stills that are fine, but none of my phones do that. Regardless I really wanna eliminate or minimize it at the source if possible.
>>3866854Anything not precisely 1/60, 1/30, 1/20, 1/15 or lower has it.
Anything higher is unusable. I live in a city though maybe the flicker is worse due to a real busy local power grid? Or maybe the grid is great and the AC is more precise than rural towns which might have some randomness in the alternating phases? Idk. All I know is the flicker is caused by AC.
When you say Walmart LEDs do you literally mean that or are you just referring to "some shit you found at a Walmart"?
They have Great Value bulbs maybe I'll try those.
>>3866877Yes, in every socket but two.
What do you use?
>>3867301When you say no flicker, are you judging it by your eye or have you tested it with cameras and high shutter speeds?
1/400th of a second should easily reveal flicker. I can't personally see my current bulbs flicker but they're problematic with cameras and with real fast moving stuff I to notice the stroboscopic effect a bit. It appears as alternating light/dark bars across the image.
I read about some people being happy with the Ikea bulbs, but I always just assumed they were cheapshit that they made to cut costs so they could include them in bulk with lighting fixtures and lamps to appeal to shoppers.
"Bulb included" vs "Bulb not included", you know.
Did a quick search and they do in fact make some decent bulbs with CRI >90 and charge $12+ for them. I'll have to look more into that. I guess IKEA actually went above entry level, good to know. Figured they'd be on Home Depot "Eco" brand tier.
