>>3882386>>3882384>>3882389You (you two? Can't quite tell if this is one person or two) entirely missed the point of what I was saying.
The particular nit I was sadly and obsessively picking was that Fuji has to include an extra control wheel on all of their camera bodies in case wants to use the small number of lenses that don't include their own aperture dial. The fact that this is a very small number of lenses makes that *worse*, not *better*. This means that Fuji has to include that extra wheel on every camera body going forward just for a tiny number of legacy lenses even if they make every future lens with an aperture ring, or Fuji has to give up on the idea of full backwards compatibility extremely early in the life of the system.
But regardless, you're treating my post as if it's some vitriolic attack against Fuji when that literally was just a nitpick, and I thought I presented it as such. I *like* Fuji's control layout! That's one of the reasons I bought a Fuji! And I also really like that Fuji decided to take the very unusual strategy of releasing multiple bodies with almost identical specs but different form factors and control layouts so users can pick which style they want.
But while I like Fuji's Shutter/Aperture/ISO control layout in general, for certain fast-moving photographic situations, I really like having the ability to load up custom modes and switch between them with one click, which is why there's an advantage to the Mode/Primary/Secondary control layout used on the X-H1, X-S10, and Canon DSLRs.
My goal here wasn't to attack Fuji, just to explain why other brands moved away from that control layout style other than cost savings. Chill the fuck out.
