>>3874869>distinctive styleHe does but he wasn't the first to do it, he just got popular with it. That's like saying Stieglitz's style became pictorialism instead of finding your academic balls and saying he just took what the brits did previously, down to the angles and scenes, and calling it his own despite not making any advancements to it. He just got away with it because he was a jew associated with museum runners (eventually became the MoMA) and americans didn't know any better.
>great photographerDebatable, i think he's a good product photographer focused on explicit portraits but hasn't shown any aptitudes in other genres. A one-trick pony and i am not even sure if he even edits his own stuff.
>hurr durr muh /pol/I am stating facts, if not then feel free to debate them because you will have a hard time doing it. Being talked about is not always good if the ones doing it are aware of your tricks, Terry isn't well known in the mainstream and in photo circles he's a notorious point regarding post-modernism gone away from its critical origin and becoming just vulgar displays for the initiated.
