>>3880956Your shots kind of suck man. Not trying to be mean or anything just telling you how it is.
It's like you took ETTR and did the opposite. You underexposed so many so far beyond any understandable attempt to meter for highlights and being cautious to try not to clip stuff. Even indoor diffused low contrast lighting shots (like CUK09774.ARW) are severely underexposed for no good reason.
>1/320 shutterspeed>for shooting girls sitting down posing for the camera>indoorsLike, really?
If you did this kinda shit on an entry level DSLR your photos would be irredeemably ruined by this though. Luckily, your gear is enough to carry usable photos out of these poor choices. If these are recent shots you should practice some more and learn how to get proper exposure so you don't have to push by at least 2-3 stops in post. LCDs can suck, and so can meters, so I would recommend learning how to expose using the histogram and also configure it to display invidividual channels rather than simply luminance if you're shooting under colored lighting.
Other than poor exposure the shots are fine though. Nice collection.
