>>3892894>A lot of people fail to get a proper exposure, it looks like a white orb instead of the moon lol.Nobody trying to take a picture of just the moon fails to expose the moon.
Anybody trying to take a wide angle photo of a landscape while also perfectly capturing the moon doesn't understand that the photo they're taking is not about the moon, or how their own vision works, and attempting to cram a detailed moon into that scene will result in a cringeworthy fake and gay image.
Nobody that actually takes pictures on the regular thinks that there's a lot of necessary theory to discuss on taking a picture of the moon. We've been shooting the moon for decades. There's even a Solar 16 equivalent for it (Looney Eleven)
That's the problem with these threads. You spergs don't have experience, you just want to pretend and flex knowledge.
Look at the shots you're using to own each other. Cereal boxes, phone handsets, "Garaje" door openers (por que no los dos?)
And the worst part? They're not even your samples. They're samples from DPReview.
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4185689You faggots can't even have your own arguments. You regurgitate other peoples arguments from other sites onto this board for hours.
Do you know how pathetic you are?
do you know that most of the board, even the ones that hate me, are snickering reading this?
Go take some fucking photos guys. You've been at this for days. Chase the dynamic range where the light itself is dynamic; not your bedroom.
