>>3906636>Isn't it funny how there is such a big taboo about posing for upskirtsKinda, but it depends.
Upskirt photography is a broad category.
You've got the no underwear shots, the lingerie shots, the casual normal panties, the lewd see-through panties, wet panty shots, and the panties pushed to the side seductive shots.
The reason why upskirt photos including casual style ones are seen as perverted is because they imply that the underwear isn't meant to be on display, it's illogical since the women is actually more clothed than a bikini but that's just the way it is.
>the same models will gladly pose in nothing but the same panties without the skirt?Women will wear revealing outfits to the beach "for free" too but that's not the same thing at all.
It's a completely different situation when you're asking them to pose bent over or with their legs spread wide so their crotch can fill most of the frame on a high res image.
Even if they're whorish individuals, they may be insecure or intimidated by such intimacy. With "x-ray" edits being popular women usually won't want to give strangers the chance of getting a great view of their crotch, Karens REE over the MakeApp app that edited faces to try and remove makeup.
There's also a lot of bullying surrounding the topic.
Take for example this video from Eugenia Cooney.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yQ8xGsJJHs&ab_channel=EugeniaCooneyHer panties are visible a few times in the video and seething virgins had a complete meltdown over it and caused a lot of drama trying to get her to take it down. Eugenia has responded to it and more or less said "It's just panties no vagina, nothing's on display, get over it." and since followed up with a video in swimsuits.
She's an eating disorder skeleton but in this regard she has been incredibly based. Also, take for example all the bikini streams on Twitch. They're allowed, but upskirts can get you banned. Western culture is fucked here. It ain't funny, it's sad.
