/p/ - Photography » Thread #3907717

[23 / 12 / ?]

553KiB, 1500x1000, 1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Vivitar 28mm f/2.8 wide angle mc

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 00:56:56 No.3907717 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3907926

I took some photos today to get familiar with this wide boi on APS-C.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 3.jpg, 645KiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 00:57:56 No.3907718 Report

Quoted By: >>3907740 >>3907742 >>3907926

Skipping some, too lazy to rename the set.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 4.jpg, 666KiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 00:59:01 No.3907720 Report

Quoted By: >>3907926

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 5.jpg, 646KiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:00:05 No.3907721 Report

Quoted By: >>3907910 >>3907926

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 6.jpg, 582KiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:01:09 No.3907722 Report

Quoted By: >>3907740 >>3907741 >>3907885 >>3907910 >>3907926

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 7.jpg, 687KiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:02:14 No.3907724 Report

Quoted By: >>3907926

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 8.jpg, 588KiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:03:19 No.3907725 Report

Quoted By: >>3907926

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 9.jpg, 752KiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:04:27 No.3907726 Report

Quoted By: >>3907740 >>3907926

Let me know which one you prefer: this one...

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 10.jpg, 515KiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:05:32 No.3907728 Report

Quoted By: >>3907741

... or this one.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 12.jpg, 837KiB, 1000x1500

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:06:44 No.3907729 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 13.jpg, 607KiB, 1000x1500

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:07:57 No.3907730 Report

Quoted By: >>3907924 >>3907926

And this concludes your dump. Let me know if you actually kinda liked any of these.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:30:36 No.3907740 Report

Quoted By: >>3907742

>>3907718
What's up with the sky

>>3907722
Neat anon
>>3907726
I prefer this one

Hope you keep enjoying yourself out there (: c'mon join us at telegram why don't you!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:35:10 No.3907741 Report

Quoted By:

>>3907728
Neither, sorry.
>>3907722
I kinda like this one the most from the ones posted.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 01:37:18 No.3907742 Report

Quoted By:

>>3907740
>>3907718
That's what blown-out exposure looks like on this camera after dragging the white point down in post. If it's way overdone I can usually tell, but I didn't notice until I switched to a screen with blue light reduction active.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 15:37:01 No.3907885 Report

Quoted By:

>>3907722
Would diegesis be the right term for something like this? Like, diegetic sound being sound that exists within the world portrayed in the scene?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 15:43:59 No.3907887 Report

Quoted By: >>3907910 >>3907916 >>3907929

Terrible, there is no sharpness at all

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 16:31:14 No.3907910 Report

Quoted By:

I like these two.
>>3907721
>>3907722

The rest are just not as interesting as these two.

>>3907887
Screw sharpness.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 16:51:50 No.3907916 Report

Quoted By: >>3907921 >>3908421

>>3907887
I've yet to see a film era 28mm f2.8 lens with good sharpness, they are all so absurdly bad and suffer so much from smearing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 17:29:58 No.3907921 Report

Quoted By:

>>3907916

getting a FD 24-35mm aspherical sometime this week.

we'll see about sharpness then.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 17:54:07 No.3907924 Report

Quoted By: >>3907929

>>3907730
Kinda. The lens can sort-of focus (>>3907730), it's just that most of these were shot at f/16 with the lens set to hyperfocal.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 18:18:08 No.3907926 Report

Quoted By:

>>3907717
>>3907718
>>3907720
>>3907721
>>3907722
>>3907724
>>3907725
>>3907726
>>3907730

nah these are all pretty mediocre. that last image could be promising if you took it in better lighting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Jun 2021 18:34:22 No.3907929 Report

Quoted By:

>>3907924 meant for >>3907887

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC08374.jpg, 606KiB, 1482x1482

Anonymous Mon 28 Jun 2021 17:07:04 No.3908421 Report

Quoted By:

>>3907916
Vivitar 24mm f/2, at f/4. Center of the frame but sharpening and shit turned off. The extreme edges are a bit soft until f/8 but further in is great.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Vivitar 28mm f/2.8 wide angle mc