>>3915051Crop moar. Decent shot but if your subject fills <10% of frame you might have to crop in a bit buddy.
>>3915090"Green mess" pictures are hard to take due to lack of visual interest. Vertical lines work. Not bad.
>>3915166Plz resize. Highlights clipped a bit. Might need a bit of a crop.
>>3915274It's a no from me. Under exposed is one thing, but flower shots need great comp to be anything more than just 'another flower'.
>>3915316Resize. See above about 'green mess'. Not as good as other anon's tree shot.
>>3915317>>3915319Decent. Try a counter intuitive approach and use a longer lens for landscape. It works.
>>3915322I feel like a longer focal length with same framing would have helped this one.
>>3915332Decent shot. Get closer to train tho for more exaggeration.
>>3915334See 'green mess' comment above.
>>3915421Not bad but damn them highlights..
>>3915422Decent geometry. A tad bland but not bad. If possible step back and use longer lens for more compression.
>>3915614>>3915615>>3915616Resize plz. Cool subject but I feel framing needs work.
>>3915630Nice geometry.
>>3915653As above. Kinda boring but still nice.
>>3915655I use paint to resize sometimes. See comment on snail pic above. This isn't too bad, but the smallness of the car means at many screen sizes it is kinda so-so. Printed 10 feet across this could be a cool pic (with some crop).
