>>3917520I don't know, I think that same forced size would work better for browsing this site. It's just annoying looking at one image that's 1000px next to another that's 3000px on side, but that's simply down to coding and execution of the board, which is decades behind the time. Despite being intended for images, it's obvious that it's poorly suitable for larger resolutions, it's even worse for a photography board. There is even no way to upload more photos in one post that's present on other chans.
