>>3926666Nothing too wrong with it (maybe the blown highlights), but lacks something to catch the eye. The bench looks nice but doesn't really attract the gaze enough. Maybe because it's too dark next to a bright area?
>>3926663I love the bokeh and it's pleasant to view. I'm not a fan of this kind of art, but I can see the appeal. Good job!
Maybe to nitpick, but I personally would have loved to see her eye unobstructed, but that's just my taste.
>>3926638That's a lovely view, and you did a good job at capturing it. Great!
>>3926284 >>3926285Some people love this style, but for me, it's just noisy and yellow. Eyes look a bit dead, and the shadows don't help. Not for me, sorry.
>>3926093 ... >>3926087I take it that you went for the overdone retro look, but for nowadays standards, these are too noisy and lack sharpness. Some compositions might be ok, but the other problems kill them for me. Just my opinion, though, if you like that style go for it.
>>3926054IR photos are hard. I like the focus and background, but the focused branch is so dark compared to the bottom ones that the nice focus is not enough to catch the eye, which ends up at the out-of-focus bottom. Had that been different, it would have been great. It's still interesting, though!
>>3925791Another retro-low-quality thing. The composition looks a bit odd to me, because the Salvamar thing is too close to the right for my taste.
>>3925575Gorgeous landscape, but the light wasn't ideal. Still, it feels like an interesting adventure shot. Wish the people had a bit less motion blur, though.
>>3925545Nice catch! I could complain about the crop and whatever but it would be missing the incredible feat of catching the right moment... Congrats!
>>3925534A dark photo without terrible noise? You got my vote already. I like it. The streetlight really catches the eye as it should. Good job.
Won't comment on every other pic from you so I can continue with other anons who didn't get any comments yet.
