/p/ - Photography » Thread #3930530

[88 / 16 / ?]

201KiB, 1047x1089, copium.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 22 Aug 2021 23:39:03 No.3930530 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3930532 >>3930534 >>3930537 >>3930542 >>3930549 >>3930559 >>3930564 >>3931003 >>3931535 >>3938035

How to fuji users justify xtrans?
I honestly don't get it, software incompatibility and soft images.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 22 Aug 2021 23:44:49 No.3930532 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930530
>soft
>very yellow
>no color contrast
>smeared detail and color
>raw file twice as big as everyone else

lol, fuji.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 22 Aug 2021 23:46:00 No.3930534 Report

Quoted By: >>3930536

>>3930530
>ZFc ftw
Nikon doing is proud once again

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 22 Aug 2021 23:57:04 No.3930536 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930534
It really is a good camera, plus with the z lens that just take a shit on everything fuji has to offer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 22 Aug 2021 23:58:26 No.3930537 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930530
oh look, it's this thread again.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 3221.jpg, 111KiB, 584x611

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 00:06:39 No.3930542 Report

Quoted By: >>3930544 >>3930559 >>3931003

>>3930530
it looks to have inherited sony's defective moire defect, lol

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 3221b.jpg, 160KiB, 569x612

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 00:08:34 No.3930544 Report

Quoted By: >>3930546 >>3930559 >>3931003

>>3930542

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 3221c.jpg, 84KiB, 571x602

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 00:11:13 No.3930546 Report

Quoted By: >>3930559 >>3931003

>>3930544
not as bad thought

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO moire.png, 3MiB, 1443x1469

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 00:19:18 No.3930549 Report

Quoted By: >>3930557 >>3930559

>>3930530
>fuji users justify xtrans
it's just a different bayer color filter array that obviously achieves what fuji says it does
software incompatibility? digging up 2015 trolling again lmao
go ahead, tell us what software you're using that can't read xtrans raws lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 01:02:55 No.3930557 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930549
Lightroom 2014 probably.

Their medium format work as expected, that's what any respectable professional use anyways.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 01:13:25 No.3930559 Report

Quoted By: >>3930567

>>3930542
>>3930544
>>3930546
>>3930549
All these show is that benchmark testing is useless on something designed for real world use ala >>3930530

And time and time again, when people are complaining about Fuji, it’s not from some tests being run, it’s from the poor performance when actually used in the field

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 02:04:52 No.3930564 Report

Quoted By: >>3930624 >>3930663

>>3930530
>I'm deepply upset about getting my ass kicked in the lightroom troll thread so I'm starting a Fuji troll thread.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 02:08:15 No.3930567 Report

Quoted By: >>3930571 >>3930623

>>3930559
>when people are complaining about Fuji
the only people complaining about fuji are non-fuji shooters, and if /p/ is to go by, its seething sony shooters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 02:14:29 No.3930571 Report

Quoted By: >>3930577

>>3930567
I struggle to see how non-Fuji shooters managed to identify the glaring worm issues?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 02:41:49 No.3930577 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930571
what worm issues?
these dumb threads keep comming up here as low effort bait posts and retards keep falling for them.
there's a long history here of wormy this wormy that, but nobody has ever been able to supply a raw file and lightroom settings to recreate them. it's fud from 2015-2016 when lightroom didn't have native xtrans support.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 03:16:53 No.3930583 Report

Quoted By: >>3930585

To be fair it's the only camera that accurately portrayed the subject's color

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 03:20:27 No.3930585 Report

Quoted By: >>3930591

>>3930583
R6 looks better to be fair.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 03:33:19 No.3930591 Report

Quoted By: >>3930623

>>3930585
Highlights are too strong but the shadows are better in the face, hair shadow lost some detail, it seems it overexposes a bit more but i would say its dynamic range is not as good.
But in practical uses the image is indistinguishable from the Zfc and if not printed + resized then include the Oly too, Fuji is still considerably different.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 05:41:24 No.3930623 Report

Quoted By: >>3931032

>>39305497
>Can't have moire if it's all a blur 4head

>>3930567
I owned Fuji, I got rid of Fuji

>>3930591
>I can't see the difference because I choose to be blind

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 05:44:54 No.3930624 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930564
What were your comments in that thread?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 07:13:46 No.3930636 Report

Quoted By: >>3930655 >>3930657 >>3930659 >>3930660

I’m leaving this fucking place. All you autistic freaks talk about is gear and all you’re doing is coping. Just go take some pictures, and not of some autism chart that allows you to see .000001% distortion or moire or whatever retarded “defect” you came up with this morning. Either go get a fucking optical engineering degree and a job or fuck off. Children playing with their moms iPhone camera are 10x the photographer you will ever be.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 08:27:59 No.3930655 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930636
>All you autistic freaks talk about is gear
One autistic freak starts a troll thread, two or three autistic consumers defend their lifestyle choices.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 08:31:12 No.3930657 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930636
see you in a few hours

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 08:44:39 No.3930659 Report

Quoted By: >>3930670 >>3930756

>>3930636
based, the amount of gearfaggotry is just dumb and it has to be the same people, we're not that many people on this board

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 08:46:42 No.3930660 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930636
>post image
>spergs open exif immediately to comment on technical choices or camera without commenting on the actual image

This board

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 08:58:40 No.3930663 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930564
I don't even know who you are.
The amount of cope from Fuji slugs is hilarious.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 09:17:24 No.3930670 Report

Quoted By: >>3934269

>>3930659
True, you can guarantee the person sperging out hard in every Fuji thread doesn't understand how to use full stops; because trannies don't get periods.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 13:18:14 No.3930742 Report

Quoted By: >>3930970

It's okay, anons.

Use the gear that suits you best. I use an x-t4 because I like the handling and feel of it. I know it's not as good as other cameras.

But I'm okay with that. Because I like using my gear and it motivates me to actually go out and take pictures.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 13:53:57 No.3930756 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930659
It really feels like there's only about 20 of us here at any given time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 17:23:49 No.3930879 Report

Quoted By: >>3930897 >>3930910

Does the Fuji noise reduction affect the raw files?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 18:16:37 No.3930897 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930879
jpegs only I believe

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 18:52:01 No.3930910 Report

Quoted By: >>3930914

>>3930879
color noise reduction is baked into the raws and there's nothing you can do about it outside of darktable

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 19:01:54 No.3930914 Report

Quoted By: >>3930923 >>3930969

>>3930910
>outside of darktable

Nope. Adobe has greatly improved their Fuji RAF de-mosaicing algorithm a while ago through their 'enhance details' function in Camera Raw. Then there's also Iridient X-Transformer, which gives you amazing results, too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 19:20:42 No.3930923 Report

Quoted By: >>3930926 >>3930960

>>3930914
yeah it sure is fun clicking on 250 images one at a time and "enhancing detail".

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 19:25:59 No.3930926 Report

Quoted By: >>3930960 >>3930968

>>3930923

You can change this setting for all images at once. Just select them all and change the setting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 21:17:52 No.3930960 Report

Quoted By: >>3930968

>>3930923
Nevermind that>>3930926 a swerved your inquiry, why do you want to enhance detail on all your pictures? Consumes a stupid amount of space

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 21:27:00 No.3930968 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930926
>>3930960
The point is that I shouldn't fucking have to and Adobe should just fix their demosaic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 21:37:11 No.3930969 Report

Quoted By: >>3930980

>>3930914
color noise reduction you fucking retard. nothing to do with demosaic. Fuji users are beyond dumb.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 21:40:33 No.3930970 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930742
Based

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO dpreview.png, 4MiB, 4096x3239

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 21:55:31 No.3930977 Report

Quoted By: >>3930982 >>3930986 >>3930987 >>3931141

OMG! Guyz, look DPREVIEW COMPARISON SHOOTS

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 22:05:09 No.3930980 Report

Quoted By: >>3931033

>>3930969
You are the retard here, retard.
Color noise reduction is only being applied when demosaicing using Adobe‘s standard algorithm. There is no ‚baked in‘ color noise reduction.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO soy fat mouth.png, 101KiB, 600x800

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 22:08:20 No.3930982 Report

Quoted By: >>3930986 >>3930987

>>3930977
OOO I LOVE TEST CHARTS YES YES MOOOOORE

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 22:25:14 No.3930986 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930977
>>3930982
Awww you mad you had your thread deleted babe, after you spent yet more time making memes that totally don't show how upset you are. :(

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 22:25:48 No.3930987 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930977
>>3930982
keked

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 23 Aug 2021 22:54:46 No.3931003 Report

Quoted By: >>3938278

>>3930530
>>3930542
>>3930544
>>3930546
All this proves is that the Olympus MFT camera looks better than cameras with larger sensors.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 00:49:59 No.3931032 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930623
>I can't see the difference because I choose to be blind
You won't see a difference when both are resized for IG, and only fools crop more than half their pictures.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 00:52:10 No.3931033 Report

Quoted By: >>3931041

>>3930980
>There is no ‚baked in‘ color noise reduction.
Perhaps not Fuji but some brands have been caught with their pants down baking NR jobs into the RAW files.
That's why Pentax got a lot of heat for their recent cameras, they perform better in low-light but lose resolution from ISO 640.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 01:18:50 No.3931041 Report

Quoted By: >>3931045 >>3931046

>>3931033
And what exactly is the problem with baking the raw with those fixes?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 01:29:05 No.3931045 Report

Quoted By:

>>3931041
It’s no longer RAW

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 01:29:16 No.3931046 Report

Quoted By:

>>3931041
You lose considerable resolution starting at said ISO 640 (more like 800) and color accuracy at ISOs higher than 3200.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 06:42:05 No.3931141 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930977
Kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 10:49:41 No.3931232 Report

Quoted By:

We can't stop winning olychads

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO x-t30-vs-x-t4.png, 421KiB, 588x1198

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 12:55:47 No.3931249 Report

Quoted By: >>3931262

just buy an x-t4 lmao

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO c1p.png, 1MiB, 1600x1089

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 12:56:54 No.3931251 Report

Quoted By: >>3931252 >>3931271 >>3931532 >>3939185

or at least learn2raw

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 12:59:34 No.3931252 Report

Quoted By: >>3931254

>>3931251
Yeah, just bake in some shit rather than testing them all similarly.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 13:05:29 No.3931254 Report

Quoted By: >>3931256

>>3931252
what are you on about

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 13:08:37 No.3931256 Report

Quoted By: >>3938037

>>3931254
For the comparison to be fair they all have to be demosaic'd by the same processing software. Different software applies different default values to processing elements of a raw file. This is basic stuff.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 13:18:22 No.3931262 Report

Quoted By:

but what about >>3931249 then? They're the same sensors.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 13:54:16 No.3931271 Report

Quoted By:

>>3931251
you made her teeth grey

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 23:31:52 No.3931532 Report

Quoted By:

>>3931251
Still the softest of the four. What went wrong?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 23:37:22 No.3931535 Report

Quoted By: >>3931540

>>3930530
This says it all TBPQH

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO womjicope.jpg, 286KiB, 845x766

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 23:48:52 No.3931540 Report

Quoted By: >>3931543 >>3931546

>>3931535

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 24 Aug 2021 23:59:28 No.3931543 Report

Quoted By:

>>3931540
I love this thing so fucking much and i initially bought fuji for the same exact reasons.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1626797403417.png, 72KiB, 400x386

Anonymous Wed 25 Aug 2021 00:11:27 No.3931546 Report

Quoted By:

>>3931540

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 27 Aug 2021 17:35:22 No.3932348 Report

Quoted By: >>3932353

The shitty overpriced optics is the biggest insult of it all.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 496328AC-85B6-452A-BAAD-AAEB50F2 (...).png, 20KiB, 200x300

Anonymous Fri 27 Aug 2021 17:50:54 No.3932353 Report

Quoted By: >>3932404

>>3932348

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_2021-08-28_01_07_34.jpg, 133KiB, 1186x596

Anonymous Fri 27 Aug 2021 23:11:15 No.3932404 Report

Quoted By: >>3932493

>>3932353

Isn't this amazing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Aug 2021 04:56:28 No.3932493 Report

Quoted By: >>3932542

>>3932404
That doesn't absolve fujifilm's bullshit though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Aug 2021 11:12:52 No.3932542 Report

Quoted By: >>3932546 >>3932848

>>3932493
Fujifilm has the best quality lenses, buddy

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 28 Aug 2021 11:22:26 No.3932546 Report

Quoted By: >>3932875

>>3932542
This is why people make fun of you. You always double down on your delusions.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1536370766053.jpg, 63KiB, 516x541

Anonymous Sun 29 Aug 2021 04:12:56 No.3932848 Report

Quoted By: >>3932875

>>3932542
Imagine being this person

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Aug 2021 05:16:45 No.3932875 Report

Quoted By: >>3932921

>>3932546
>>3932848
wtf this is 4chan, how do people in all places fall for the most basic bait
or just playing along for the trivial lols amirite

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Aug 2021 08:41:42 No.3932921 Report

Quoted By: >>3932962

>>3932875
>I was just pretending
As always, period pal.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 29 Aug 2021 10:25:41 No.3932962 Report

Quoted By:

>>3932921
Fuji wins every time, just accept it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 01 Sep 2021 18:28:44 No.3934269 Report

Quoted By:

>>3930670
kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Sep 2021 21:05:37 No.3938035 Report

Quoted By: >>3938050

>>3930530
does fuji or sony have cheaper lenses?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Sep 2021 21:23:09 No.3938037 Report

Quoted By: >>3938053

>>3931256
>For the comparison to be fair they all have to be demosaic'd by the same processing software. Different software applies different default values to processing elements of a raw file. This is basic stuff.
>Use debayering software on a non-bayer-pattern sensor
>OMG looks so bad!
Well no shit Anon, you fucked yourself over. It's like running slide through C-41 then bitching that the colours look bad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Sep 2021 22:07:17 No.3938050 Report

Quoted By:

>>3938035
Sony have Tamron, Sigma, Samyang and Viltrox.
Fijifilm has Viltrox.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO dhtrhrh.jpg, 179KiB, 737x737

Anonymous Sat 11 Sep 2021 22:24:57 No.3938053 Report

Quoted By:

>>3938037
nooooooooooo you have to use canikon demosaicer on fuji sensors!!! otherwise it's unfair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

xt2nigger

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO FFFFUUUUJJJIIIII.jpg, 331KiB, 996x652

xt2nigger Sun 12 Sep 2021 00:20:04 No.3938087 Report

Quoted By: >>3938240 >>3938275 >>3938280

how to justify xtrans:
camera goes clcik and fits hand, good for me

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Sep 2021 08:14:20 No.3938240 Report

Quoted By: >>3938347

>>3938087
You might want to scrub the photgraphers name from the exif buddy,

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Sep 2021 11:31:36 No.3938275 Report

Quoted By: >>3938347

>>3938087
Hey jerry

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Sep 2021 11:59:40 No.3938278 Report

Quoted By:

>>3931003
super impressed with olympus results desu

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Sep 2021 12:02:44 No.3938280 Report

Quoted By:

>>3938087
I swear you're a sony bro that just comes here to post shit Fuji and film photos, and say the dumbest shit possible, in an attempt to discredit those that don't use Sony.

xt2nigger

xt2nigger Sun 12 Sep 2021 17:41:29 No.3938347 Report

Quoted By: >>3938352

>>3938240
>>3938275
Send me a pizza im hungry

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Sep 2021 17:48:22 No.3938352 Report

Quoted By: >>3938518

>>3938347
sug kuk negernylle

xt2nigger

xt2nigger Mon 13 Sep 2021 00:44:16 No.3938518 Report

Quoted By:

>>3938352
Nej du, beställ pizza åt mig

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Sep 2021 12:09:14 No.3939185 Report

Quoted By:

>>3931251
>highlights left the chat

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches