>>3963756first of all, out of the two you liked, one of them is the most overedited in the entire thread, the blur added in post is jarring, when the picture on it's own is striking enough.
secondly
>there's a cool pic under all the overeditingthat means it's a great pic, if the at it's core it's a good photo that can be elevated by some editing. some of them def go a little far in terms of temperature extremes, but several of those would be seriously lackluster without the editing.
