>>3966436I've mentioned the professional since the first post, who does this exact thing because they just need to get the shot. No, I didn't explicitly mention it, but that's what I meant when I said that professionals are playing a different game from the hobbyist
>>3966439>sour grapesAnon, you're making shit up. "Going wider and then cropping to frame" is lazy and sloppy. You can do it, I can't stop you, but it's sloppy and you should probably not do it if you don't have to, because it's sloppy, bad practice for actually getting good at framing
>>3966441That's not at all what it is. It's like buying extra wood for a project, then not measuring your cuts precisely and having to waste wood. Like, okay, go for it, but you're not a good craftsman if you just chuck money and slop your way through because "you can" and "you're just mad that I have more money to spend on wood". No, spend your money on the wood, but I will call your craft sloppy because it is
