>>3978281Stole my words, if these were your favorite, lmao. These are crap, they look like crappy phone pictures you’d show on your story because they’re so boring and forgettable.
>>3978285No you don’t. You took a bunch of street photography, good focus with no interesting subjects your exposure isn’t bad, but you’re shooting on a sunny day with 800, the consistent sharpness means it’s probably auto. Why would anyone want ugly film of chairs? Why do you call these your favorites?
You got a film camera with 800 ISO film and took pictures of chairs (2 were with people, one with hands raised) on a sunny day with auto focus. You’re using a camera like it’s a smartphone. One of your favorites is a track light with 2 bulbs.
>>3978291 is right. If this isn’t your first roll, I’d say even an amateur with a disposable will at least take meaningful pictures with their friends or activities. These look at best like benchmarking your film and camera.
