>>3984763>M6II-small battery which doesn't last that long, and it will drain fast unless you are constantly switching the camera off in between shooting
-EVF is pretty average; the field of view feels small and low res compared to my R6
-can not use accessory EVF and accessory flash simultaneously, since there's only one hot shoe
-the back screen flips *up* so you have to remove the EVF or whatever is mounted in the hot shoe to use it for "selfie mode" (the 90D has a side-flipping, reversible screen)
-you do get more external controls than any other EOS M camera (including an AF-On button!), but you're still lacking some of the standard DSLR amenities, like top LCD display, AF joystick, and a few extra buttons
-small ergos...better than other EOS M cameras, but doesn't hold a candle to a DSLR (or EOS R)
+smaller camera system overall
+access to EF-M lenses (some are really good, others are average, but all are very compact, which is a big plus to a lot of people)
It's been a while since I sold mine, but I also remember that Canon gimped the shutter in some way...like it had a relatively small buffer or there was no option for a silent shutter. Look those things up because I'm going from memory.
>90D-you can make use of the same, latest generation dual pixel, on-sensor AF that the M6II has, but you have to use the back screen as there is no option for EVF (even as an accessory for the hot shoe)
-DSLR autofocus is very good (also latest generation), but lacks the precision and ease to track objects from sensor edge to edge, so you may be shooting a lot in live view
+real ergos
+real battery capacity
+option to use an optical viewfinder, which is always fun to use
+lots of familiar external controls, top LCD
+it's designed to be a semi-pro/prothusuast camera, whereas all the EOS M cameras are designed as consumer-oriented, so you get 1/8000 sec max shutter speed and minimal gimping to the specs
+all the ports and hot shoes you need
+weather sealing
