>>4022537>Do you not know how mountains work?anon clouds don't form sideways
>So suddenly having one side of the frame in focus is now "unbalanced"?it's not about the focus, it's about the composition...
>And have your highlights blown out by the contrast? People underexpose for a reason.clearly you don't understand hte purpose of underexposing, you can push +1 on the jpg without blowing highlights.
Your subject (the flowers? or at least the foreground) is exposed for zone 3, the clouds are exposed for zone 5, and the rando patch of clouds in the background are exposed for zone 7.
If "people underexpose for a reason", what's your reason?
>Maybe you should leave /p/, it's obvious you're fucking stupid when it comes to things like this. Nothing is more annoying that little faggots like you pretending to know what he's talking about, over someone who is a contrarian. Fuck you're insufferable dude.No, go bring your picture to your dad and ask him the following questions:
>Is this picture underexposed?>Is the horizon crooked?>Is the composition balanced?He'll definitely agree to the first two. Not sure if he will have it in his heart to break it to you about the last one though, but that depends on what kind of relationship you have with him.
