>>4031813I like this one more, the other one has a bit too much negative space up top, and it my eyes don't really want to go to the subject otherwise
Maybe you could have tried to put him on a vertical line of thirds, so that we'd pay attention both to the statue and the nature, there's also quite a bit of negative space on the right
I feel like with a slight change of position and framing you can make your subject pop a lot better.
I kinda had the same dilemna with
>>4031753which I also like in 3:2, but it definitely doesn't have a clear subject that way (see picture)
>>4031817I like the exposure, but think it'd be better if closer to the statue, you'd have a shallower DoF while retaining the shapes of the background, and there wouldn't be so much space up top
Maybe a 4:3 vertical crop could work?
>>4032242Thanks Anon, I agree with the close ups, I'm really not used to shooting small stuff and I was kinda giving it a try. Definitely a learning experience, I wouldn't say I'm satisfied with the pictures of flowers or even that poor cute mushroom and snail, they deserved better
