>>4031178plain and simple, for better or worse
there are barely any lines to look at, the color palette is very monotonous, the only thing that catches the eye is a circle that's not even circular
the look also looks a bit fake, like you added grain to a picture showing digital noise and a dirty sensor
>>4031176plain and simple again, though imo the pic on the right is quite striking, it looks like space photography, though without stars
>>4031166what in the world is this anon, start shooting film and developing it wrong if you like this kind of look
>>4031158nice stairs, though the muted colors make them less interesting and popping than they could be
it's also quite crowded, there's a great many lines which have nothing to do with one another (the gate on the bottom left, the writings on the wall, the text, the handrails, the vertical tubes, the steps...), and the same goes for the colors
>>4031125the contrast between the straight line and the bird is workable, but the dark and brooding look makes the picture look a tad amateurish and negate part of the contrast that could otherwise be accentuated, like the copious vignetting which darkens the sky, reducing the contrast with the architecture and bird, or the low saturation of every single color which reduces the contrast between the architecture and the comparatively colorful bird
>>4031124nothing stands out visually, and it doesn't seem to "tell a story" as other dime a dozen street snaps
>>4031109looks like a middle school art textbook illustration
"how to look at art past 1850"
>>4031099nice idea, though the leaves on top leave a nice space on the bottom right and the man in yellow and beige is far too much to the left of the frame that they create
also the crowd in the middle of the frame kinda dilutes the effect because the foliage isn't thick enough to cover them, so it almost looks like your eye should wander there to find something interesting, only to find a messy crowd
