>>4042750>The A6600 has a shitty side EVFagreed here but i never used it for photography, im talking video here
>Worse autofocusThe autofocus on the a6600 is literally the same technology the a9 uses and they have the same sensor design and the smaller sensor of the 6600 makes it even better to focus on.
>It is Canon so who knows.yeah im in a hot weather so im not risking that, that is one of the reasons i didn't even considered an r5 and got the a7siii.
>RF lenses are stellar and there's the entire EF library to choose from.Im talking about native lenses for the apc-s mount. The new sony lenses for the apc-s are amazing, if i knew they would continue these lenses i wouldn't buy the a7siii.
>LMFAO, don't try to flip that script. Fuji/Canon colors are easy to work withyeah i edit weddings for a living, maybe in lightroom r5 colours and fuji with those weird profiles are gonna make that 'film look'which is boring in 2022 imo.
Anyway i edited more than 10 weddings shot on c200 as an a-cam and a6500 as a b-cam and the canon was a nightmare to work on bro... it was c-log tho...
>>4042753>>one card slotto be fair that's why i went for the a7siii route because i was risking a lot for the business, i even came from a gh5 before that which was a stupid move
> the a6600 gets beat by the cheaper R10 on everything except IBIS. The R7 rapes the a6600. Fuji X-T4 would be a competitor to the R7, not the overpriced/underspec'd a6600.Yeah another internet photographer who gets attached on the specs, the xt4 is a nightmare to work with in a run n gun envioroment that's why all the videographers in know just went for a sony a7iii and the more pro ones went for the a7siii. It's a sony world if you make money on VIDEO. Photographers all vary but also the pro ones here now use an a7v, coming from r5's. they have that new fuji as a b cam tho for locations stuff.
Do whatever you want with that info, using the gear> reading about the gear. Specs aren't everything.
