>>4048286You brought nothing to this photograph and it could have been replicated by a robot, a toddler, or an ape. There is no thought towards composition, no thought towards editing, no thought whatsoever. You had an animal-reaction to a waterfall. You saw a waterfall, and you took a thoughtless photograph of the thing you saw. This is not a photograph: it is evidence of your inability to take a photograph or to understand what photography is. I am assuming it is bait, given your idiotic framing of the story, involving the time-frame (that you've been sitting on this gem for a couple of years, in eager anticipation of releasing its genius to the world) and your mother, and this leaves us with two options: You are either a troll or a failure, and both of them are ugly and undeserving of the time and energy I have put into this post. Leave /p/ and never return.
