>>4054670Decent composition but like anon said it would've been better if done with everything standing still aka higher shooter speed. In B&W you can get away using higher ISO settings.
>>4054672A bit dark but you might've wanted to showcase a nighttime vibe, shame the composition lacks something in the lower left corner for it to be "complete" (4 corners and center)
>>4054673Focused on the background, bad luck. Maybe needs a crop to chop that left side area.
>>4054675OK i guess, maybe it needed more of the statue's leg not being cropped and you might want to geometrically correct it, for example tame down the barrel dis. and add a tiny of vertical perspective.
>>4054676Not on focus either, a shame because it is decent, i would crop it hard too on the left side and correct the horizon to make the background castle's merlons less confusing.
>>4054677This is the kind of image that can be better if depth of field was thinner, that is to make the pigeons separate from the bushes and other high-frequency details of the background. Also a bit out of focus or blurry, still pretty cool attempt
>>4054678Kind of a meme post-process technique but i think it looks fine here, would also crop the right side to make the composition a square (white top, black bottom, left camera girl, right couple). Maybe it's just me but i see some really jaggy edges in the last building's top windows right from the white sky. Fav so far
>>4054680What did you want to attempt, it's neither the building nor a dude image, it's in the middle and resolves none in satisfactory fashion. Sometimes stuff looks too cool to pass out but sadly for those instances you need wide angles and/or aggressive crop ratios (vertical panoramas for instance)
>>4054682Pretty common shoot but cool nonetheless, this one also needs geometric corrections like that barrel and a bit of vertical to make it really compressed and tight.
>>4054734Eat my shorts faggot, not everyone has the same perspective as you either
