>>4055949>>4056379I have a 24 and a 50 prime. was going to go for the 85 or 105 primes but now i'm thinking i made a mistake and should have just done the zooms. like i should have started with the 24-70 then picked up a 70-200 and maybe a 14-24.
Now granted, if i were to buy new, those three lenses would total $7300 vs. about $2600 which, I admit, is incredibly significant. still, i'm just thinking rather than spend the $1500 or so on the two primes, I should have just gone for the 24-70 right away for more versatility. there have been way more times than i thought would happen where i've been out somewhere and either wanted something different and felt limited in the shooting. granted i also know the 1.8 is faster than the 2.8, just feeling a bit limited sometimes when i'm out shooting and really don't want to carry a fucking bag everywhere.
