>>4072993Nice attempt but you should've stepped further away then zoomed in to get the bottom appearing more lined up, instead of being distorted from wide angle
>>4072994Snapshit
>>4072995>i saw that pic with the four corners of wall and sky and ocean and wanted to repeat it but i don't know how to line up straight lines>>4072996Snapshit. What, are you texting your landlord to clean out the gutters?
>>4072997Feels like flickr in 2005, i see what you're trying but the visual interest (the background in light behind the bell) has nothing of interest, it's just messy, boring nothing.
>>4072998I see what you're goin for but the composition/lighting just doesnt work
>>4072999Snapshit. At least this one is properly exposed
>>4073000Messy composition doesn't lead the eye anywhere, too many competing elements (like blob of black on right edge)
>>4073006>Think a little bit more about what interests you about these subjects. What drew your attention to them as opposed to any number of other things you could have chosen?This is great advice
OP it looks like you saw a bunch of popular trendy geometric street-architecture shots on insta and tried to copy the basic compositional idea, without understanding what made them great.
To make a good photo, you need interesting subject, strong composition, or good lighting. A great photo will have more than two, and an amazing photo will have all three.
There is no subject in any of these, and the lighting is weak in most of them. What you have left is a shallow compositional technique that you've tried to copy from other more popular photos without understanding what made the other photos popular in the first place. Like this
>>4072993 lining up perpendicular against a window wall, but messing up the alignment, or
>>4072995 Going for the 4 corners shot but messing up the alignment and not paying attention to the messy background, or
>>4072997 going for a silhoutte shot with no visual interest to in background
