>>4079339If you are a begginer you are overthinking it so so so much.
Going FF from the beginning could be ok if you are really wealthy, otherwise a random used a6000 serie would do the trick. You can always sell it used again after a while. An a6000 could go for 350€ used with the stock lens and usually some extras.
About lenses, if you need to learn, two or three cheap and fast lenses could be a lot more proficient and aps-c helps keeping price low.
Some random examples: (prices for new, local reseller in Rome, Italy or Amazon)
Samyang 12mm F2.0 (300€)
Sony 20mm f2.8 (250€)
Sigma 30mm f2.8 (200€)
7Artisans 55mm f/1.4 (150€) (note: around 80mm on FF)
Samyang 85mm f/1.4 (300€)
Sony 55-210 F4.5/6.3 (250€)
With this prices for lenses you should probably avoid spending money for UV filter but you should try circular polarizers and neutral density. A cheap tripod (Manfrotto used to have a decent and lightweight one for less than 100€) will be a must have for certain applications, so something to consider too. A flash is a must have for portraits and must be considered too!
That said, in my opinion a zoom is not a good pick as a first lens. The one you proposed, expecially on FF is a really good idea from lenght and aperture standpoint. The downside is that's quite expensive and heavy (1kg).
But the worst thing, IMHO, is that if you need to learn composition, a prime could be more useful because pone you some costrains and more often than not force you to move yourself in the space, sperimenting different views and having to compromising for FOV and DOF!
TLDR: you are going for an expensive system, and the price will inflate a lot with extra gears that are needed. If you are a beginner, and you are not even shure witch kind of photos you will take, consider a cheaper system to upgrade later with more awareness of your needs.
