>>4092227again for the third time you troglodyte, nobody is talking about bullshit ''soul'' or ''heritage'' or ''brand'' you absolute insect, you parasite. i think 100 people already told you in 3 different threads that nikon, fuji, sony and others have lenses that render like that to. its nothing to do with ''brand'' or ''soul'' or ''heritage'' you baboon, its HOW A LENS IS DESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED. its 100% up to the manufacturer to choose if they want to use cheap manufacturing and cheap optics to increase their profits from sales or to invest in better CNC machinery, lasers and better optics engineering to create better glass for their lenses. it just so happens that your beloved shitma that youre shilling for, chose the first option, so did samyang and so did a few other made in china grade manufacturers.
i can show you a NIKON image that rendered the same as zeiss/hass/voigt/leica
i can show you a FUJI image that rendered the same as zeiss/hass/voigt/leica
i can show you a SONY image that rendered the same as zeiss/hass/voigt/leica
i can show you a PENTAX image that rendered the same as zeiss/hass/voigt/leica
i can show even show you a shitty TAMRON lens image that rendered the same as zeiss/hass/voigt/leica
...etc.
but i CAN NOT show you ANY sigma or samyang image that rendered the same as zeiss/hass/voigt/leica
nothing to do with ''brand'' or ''soul'' or ''heritage'' you detestable parasite
also, go and buy a zeiss lens and then show to everyone just how exactly the same a lens without apo glass, without laser CNC light intesity finish glass and without glass elements that refine light transmission, is exactly the same as a camera lens with all of the aforementioned AND MORE. just do a side by side bro
