>>4095733>cucked old EVFIt's only the old resolution. It's got all the other improvements of the X-H2/s, including the larger magnification (bigger deal to me than the resolution), larger diagonal angle of view, better diopter and eye point.
> But I also hate the flippy screen of the X-H2...I really dont like PASMIt sounds like you want to do a lot of video, but hate the things that make shooting video much easier.
I do a lot currently with X-T bodies & a Ninja V currently, and am planning to pickup an X-T5 in addition to an X-H2/s (still undecided). The X-H2/s are great because I can basically get the same or better quality without having to rig a camera up anymore.
The X-T dials are nice for stills, but I honestly shoot so much in aperture priority that it's not a huge dealbreaker for me anymore. I'd still ignore the PASM, but the C1-7 will be a god send for easily switching between preset 4k30 4k60 8k30, and then just preset stills settings (aperture priority, different auto-ISO limits, flash / studio, etc). It's a bit more cumbersome with the X-T4 to have to go through the menu to switch custom video presets.
X-T5 is absolutely solid, but just get an X-H2/s if video is a big priority.
>>4095739 >>4095833H.265 is just really computer intensive to work with, it's not a good codec for editing. Sucks enough that pre-recorder, I just stuck with H.264. ProRes is awesome though, and I usually shoot the standard (not HQ / LT).
