>>4106018>This stinks of the gibson guitar shills from /mu/ that had nothing in life but regret for paying $1800 for a goofy retro guitar that doesn't stay in tune. And the subject matter, as well.Again I don't think it's derived from that, even if the mentality is the same (but at least Gibson is actually cool unlike Fuji - other than the LP tbat is). It comes from Trump Derangement Syndrome. You know who they remind me of, even more than gibsonfags? The teletranny, who used to buy the most tryhard yet wannabe shit and then get mad whenever he got mocked for it. He had spent a good chunk of money on subpar gear, a Boss Katana beingone of them. And he wore rainbow flag shoes. Pic related lol. Larped as being rich but his life savings were clearly spent in his söy bullshit.
This is not to defend Gibson, of course. Just saying I can see the appeal of Gibsons even if they're currently overpriced pieces of shit. At the very least they appear cool on the surface. Me? I'd get a Japanese copy, better craftsmanship all around. I plan to get one when I eventually go there even though I'm no weeb.
>>4106020>whatever it is you shillOh the irony, fujifags have been aggressively shilling their shitty lineup for years now.
>>4106022>XT-4Yeah when it comes to Fuji that is one of the most passable ones. I'd get an X-T200 myself because of the bayer sensor.
>>4106023>If this isn't you, why go to such lengths to defend it lmaoHe does it because I'm telling the truth. Take your meds.
>Keep fighting the good fight manHe likely is the guy who replied to your post first. I'm the guy you're accusing him of being (
>>4105931 )
>>4106029Jesus WTF. Where I'm from it's the same price as C41.
>>4106039Based post.
>But with no offset leica-looking viewfinder it's hard to sell false nostalgia to zoomers.Personally I find it amazing they think that stupid viewfinder good looking. Must be secondhand Leica cargo culting.
