>>4114370You are a pseudo-bicameral schizo stuck between the animal and the human, unevolved and incapable of fully comprehending itself. not much higher than a dog. unable to peer into your own soul, you reach the answer at the beginning of the question. "it is". what little of a human mind you have then applies spiritual value to this and becomes stuck in its way, unaware that the correct answer is to apply spiritual value to the lack of this, to synthesize free will with freedom from flesh.
Whichever of these two posts you were
>>4114353>>4114354Your inability to show an example, or realize that "emotions" are in fact both concrete (mortal) and ethereal (the spiritual) and the ratio of those components varies, is telling of your truncated consciousness.
And I would bet on you being a terrible photographer as well.
Yes photographer can represent the inner but only if you're not too stupid to see it without my brother chaim beating you over the head with its most grotqesque and demonic forms.
