>>4120078>mog sonyNo, dude, no. Nikon already did that.
>inb4 yeah but muh 61mp!yeah but your dynamic range faked by noise reduction that gets mogged by a 7 year old DSLR when someone tests the actual dynamic range in an underexposed photo instead of the signal/noise ratio in a test chart of gray circles.
yeah but your fake weather sealing sony is constantly redefining every time someone finds out it fails to a water test that's less hard on seals than actual rain.
yeah but your inferior lens lineup because your APSC sized mount isn't exactly electro-mechanical adapter friendly while nikon users can use all their lenses AND all of yours.
yeah but your APSC sized mount so you need more software vignetting correction than anyone else and can't take full advantage of mirrorless.
yeah but your god awful UI/UX that legitimately needs customized.
yeah but your finishes, including screen coatings, that rub off in 2 years.
yeah but your zeiss partnership that's somehow putting out the odd lens that's inferior to a samyang.
yeah but your god awful color rendition SOOC that mandates editing every single photo while nikon cameras shit out vivid landscapes and pleasing skin tones with 0 effort required.
yeah but your easily confused AF that leads the pack in focusing on branches instead of birds.
yeah but sony is the most expensive while barely even being second best, to the point that people with DSLRs cite sony as the reason they haven't switched, up until the point they find out about the glory that is the nikon Z7 II.
