>>4118676That's like saying "if you're using such a cheap field camera stick to SLRs". There are many things phones are optically and mechanically incapable of because of their small optics and extreme crop factor. You can take photos on a $150 camera and $100 lens that a phone can not honestly replicate and the whole experience/creative process is different. Camera gear is not prices sensibly/fairly either, optical technology hit a plateu ages ago where the only way to go is a bigger lens with more corrective elements. A lot of very expensive lenses do not perform noticeably better than very cheap lenses unless you test both of a 60mp sensor and zoom it at least 100% to get the nose-to-the-wall experience of looking at the maximum print size at 300dpi. and then you nitpick the... very negligible differences in how sharp a single strand of hair is.
at this point you're also going to check your phone and see the strand of hair is cut into 3 pieces and is twice as fat.
how about
>fixed lenswith that limitation just stick to your smartphone
does that make as much sense?
