[6 / 2 / 5]
746KiB, 800x1068, sony fe 35mm 2.8 vs samyang 35mm 2.8 flare-1-X3.jpg
I'm split on which version of this lens to buy, but I have a problem
>samyang example on top
>sony/zeiss on bottom
The photographers using the sony really TRY to do a better job, catch good light, etc while it's hard to find a photo taken by the samyang that is any good. Missed focus, flat lighting, and cluttered shit everywhere. Even on flickr the composition, lighting, etc by people with expensive gear is generally better and it makes it hard to decide which lens actually has the character I want because the talent of the photographer generally overrides the gear unless it's terrible, but talented high-effort photographers also tend to spend a lot of money on gear.
Surely someone who is a good photographer, not an expert in taking photos of walls, owns both?
>samyang example on top
>sony/zeiss on bottom
The photographers using the sony really TRY to do a better job, catch good light, etc while it's hard to find a photo taken by the samyang that is any good. Missed focus, flat lighting, and cluttered shit everywhere. Even on flickr the composition, lighting, etc by people with expensive gear is generally better and it makes it hard to decide which lens actually has the character I want because the talent of the photographer generally overrides the gear unless it's terrible, but talented high-effort photographers also tend to spend a lot of money on gear.
Surely someone who is a good photographer, not an expert in taking photos of walls, owns both?
