>>4170004>It’s 3d objects on a table you 3d pop schizoThey are much thinner than the depth of field.
>Its close enough for differences that matter>RP looks bigger than a7RIV>"close enough"lol, it's an example I found by accident by the way. Use camerasize instead.
>Don’t exist or let randos hold cameras that they are still selling for $3k new 5 years later/discontinued DSLRsWhy would a beginner buy a $3k camera when he's just dipping his toes into this art? It's a waste. Also for older stuff there's used camera stores, pawn shops and thrift stores.
>Only according to people who saw their favorite camera did worse than a sonyNo, according to anyone who knows their shit, like Bill Claff.
>Prove it lies?Their business model is boosting sales the best they can.
>Totally irrelevant. In camera processing and sensor tech matters the most. Kek, those things are last in the imaging chain. You could have the best sensor in the world but if your lenses suck your pictures will suck. And if the lenses for your mount are scarce, mediocre and expensive you have a shitty camera even if the sensor is the best.
>Vignetting memes don’t matter if you have noise banding or sharpening artifacts. DR doesn’t matter if you want to hook the camera up to a star tracker and pentaxonycanikon baked in long exposure NR eats stars.And how were you going to find out about banding when pushing shadows when you're basing your decisions off shitty dpreview studio shots? You're basically admitting the tools you recommended suck ass. Also fixing vignetting in post is just a cope.
