>>4139240here come the excuses and coping lmfao
>missed focus1. focus exactly on her iris + its a 1930's manufal focus lens shot from a tripod, couldnt have missed focus even if i wanted to
2. as if missing or hitting focus somehow matters when looking at image quality and rendering
>nothing sharp1. thats the whole point of the soft edit
2. as if that matters when looking at image quality and rendering
>shitty editing to hide lower contrast>to HIDE LOWER CONTRAST>kekyou mean i have hidden supposed ''low contrast'' by having put -35 reduced contrast on the slider and -18 reduced saturation on slider (in LRC) to get the softened look? ah, my bad, i deeply apologize, i didnt know that you can hide low contrast by further lowering the contrast and saturation oh AND I also added softening to the image by reducing clarity to -15 or -10 or somewhere in that range. my bad sorry.
>lowered contrast, lowered saturation, softened the image ON A 100 YEAR OLD LENS>still looks more 3D than a 2023 sigma lenskeep on making excuses and coping kek
>flaring highlights>flaring1. thats not flaring
2. its called the light glow effect and i manually edited it to fit the whole soft color, desaturated aesthetic
>overly yellow skinthats literally her skin color + she was even more yellow in real life and sooc image
racist, making excuses and hard coping. whats next?
>certainly looks like a 100 year old lens, absolute dogshityup, exactly a 100 year dogshit old lens that is sharper and renders better than a 2023 samyang, sigma, tamron, laowa, 7artisans, tokina, viltrox you name it
>>4139240>>4139241>samefagging on a dead, derailed threadkek
>sorry i'm not into the underage jap schoolgirl aesthetic>regularly posts on 4chanimplying you have ever even touched a girl in real life
sorry that i make money with my camera, you take photos of your dog. id rather take cosplayer egirl images than work a 9-5 even again
anyway keep making excuses and coping for owning shit glass
