>>4129803Complete and utter nonsense. Not only is it factually incorrect, how can he make a blanket statement about every single jurisdiction on the entire planet?
I’m sure retards like that said shit like that when film was introduced, that you could only use plates for evidence, and before that they said you would never be able to use photography.
In the real world what happens is that a bunch of lawyers, judges law professors sit down and discuss how a new type of evidence needs to be dealt with. Otherwise how the hell would our legal system be able to function at all in the modern world? We’d be forever stuck in Hammurabi’s time or worse.
