>>4135911I can't, I do and judge most things by feel. If anything, photography in my take is about expressiveness, about something you want to convey or exaggerate, document, capture emotionally, something you like to play through or elaborate, put into images for yourself or someone other.
Let me reason why these images have a hard time picking me up. I've never been to Iceland, can't relate to parts of what you see, imagine and feel, smell, remember. I don't feel connected, have nothing to wake up to, no smell, no wind, no people, places, buildings, stories to walk through. I could now talk about wedding photography, where you try to hit a tooth in the image style, but also just to accompany the day in its entirety with images to take the viewer. with you. You want to have explaning images for everything, images that feel involved and close. In fact, at every place and every action, images must be taken that can answer questions: Who, where, what, how, why. This gives a common thread that people should be able to find empathy in shots: The guests drove to the church, the bride and groom were not there yet, the father of the bride is waiting impatiently,... For this, participants often have a subjective and sketchy perception of what happened, they may have noticed details or twists that they like to find in pictures, too. Pictures can be imperfect and feel more real as e.g. things were rushed, because reality was not perfect. As a photographer, taking the first-person perspective while eating, dancing, talking also helps here. An emotional look towards the bride and groom it needs pictures from both perspectives: Who is looking and how, and what do they see? Now wedding pictures have it very easy, because a lot of people were there and already find an emotionality in the pictures.
Text limit reached. (1/2)