>>4135429oh nooooo a basic text prompt that is open to literally anyone in the world how will i keep up
Here's what you literal fucking retards don't get about ai, and you don't get it because you're actually fucking stupid and the logic of the world eludes you:
1) Photography exists because it's a document of events, things, people that actually happened. No one, and I mean fucking NO ONE, gives a fuck about fake shit that never happened. A picture is worth a thousand words. A fake pictures is worth zero words.
2) AI will, for the course of your lifetime and the course of your great-grandchildren's lifetime, always struggle with verisimilitude. There are so many glaring errors just in OP's photo that it instantly reinstates my disbelief. "Oh, give it a few years, just wait!" Be prepared to say that for the rest of your fucking life you fucking loser. It's like calculating pi. Each additional decimal point adds another order of magnitude's worth of calculation and complexity. The first 60% of versimilitude is easy. 61% is insanely difficult, 62% is unlikely to happen within your lifetime, 70% won't happen in the heat death of the universe. Complexity scales logarithmically, but computing power scales arithmetically. I'm sure they would have covered this in your comp sci 101 course, but you never took it because you're barely a high school dropout.
3) The existence of AI only gives "real" photography more power, for the reasons mentioned above. It's like a knockoff t-shirt or watch or whatever. It's easy enough to get something to look extremely close to the original, to the point that it fools the layman, but you will never, ever fool an expert, and that's the crucial downfall.
