>>4141993>Wiki>"In digital photography, the 35mm-equivalent aperture range is sometimes considered to be more important than the actual f-number....">But shutter speedSo you do admit aperture equivalence is real?
>AgainAgain.
>An article and a forum post are the same thing???
>But pixel countThat is just an easier way of stating SNR across the whole image, instead of per pixel, as after all we are after photos, not individual pixels, aren't we?
>F2 on apsc allows for faster ss than f2.8 on FFOk, you have to answer one question first, which is more important, the noise present in an image and it's dynamic range, or what label an iso value has?
>It does not gather more light per mm2True, but it has more mm2, so it gathers more light, aka signal. Before you go back to this and try to argue more, you have to answer the question above first.
>>4142007No, dof also includes the subject focus distance and size of sensor too. Subject focus distance for obvious reasons, size of sensor because a larger sensor will include more of your foreground, which assuming you're standing on a floor will mean your image will have a further depth distance in it.
